Home
www.nopaddle.com
Contents
1. “Culture War” Propaganda that Supports Domestic Violence and Sexual Abuse
2. School Beatings in the News “Parental “Support” (as long as they remain ignorant)
3. Paddling: “Out of Control” Pseudo Science
4. Paddling Brutality and Injuries
5. Reasons for Paddling
6. Can We Justify Child and Adolescent abuse?
7. Does Paddling Do Any Good?
8. The Phallic Paddle
9. Padding in the Digital Age: “Bringing Back the ‘Good Old Days?’”
10. “Did Jesus Teach "School Paddling?”
·$1,000 Cash Reward
·“The wisdom of serpents”
·Ministers, Priests, & Churchmen Free from Sexual Abuse?
·Paddling adolescent’s butts for Jesus?
·The Weightier Matters of the Law
·The buttocks is a sexual area
·Perverted Nakedness
·Adam, Eve, and “Porneia”
·Spanking Teens for Jesus?
·Quoting Bible, Madison activist shows parents how to spank a child
·Girl whipped with cord, wears sign saying she was spanked
·Headmaster convicted of child molestation murdered in jail
·“Buns Up” Christian Academy in Phoenix
·“Butt – Daddy” Video Headmaster in New Zealand
·Catholic School (maybe Baptist too) panty and bare-butt strappings
·Covenant House
·DRESS MODESTLY AND “BEND OVER”?
·“Christian” High School Spanking Quotes
·A word to paddling principals: It is never “God’s will” to paddle her.”
11. Other Religious Views
12. Lifetime Sexual and Psychological Damage for Victims and Witnesses
13. Sadism: a Job Hazard for Paddlers
14. School Paddling as Sexual Harassment
What made you feel so good when your baby, baby get a evening gown?
Must be the same old thing that makes a preacher lay his Bible down.
--Sue Foley, “Same Thing,” from the blues CD "Love Comin' Down"
There is a poem that is popular with souvenir stores and religious bookstores. It is about a person who walked on the beach with God. When she got to the most difficult times in life she noticed that there was only one set of footprints in the sand. She became angry, and assumed that God had left during the toughest times in her life. Then the punch line comes: Those were the times God carried her. The poem might be so common now that it seems trite, but nonetheless I like it.
If we take that religious analogy, however, to our adolescent-paddling schools, we’ll find only “one set of footprints” in that murky sand all the way. This time it’s not because God is “carrying” the paddler, although He may have to “carry” some young victims who were abused in that way. It is a fact that, biblically speaking, God nowhere commanded men to coerce children and adolescents to “bend over for butt whacking.” The only “footprints” that violently approach adolescent’s upturned butts are those of the paddler, and they more closely resemble those of a “mounting instinct” animal than those of a spiritual or intellectual man.
One of the primary driving forces of school paddling in the United States, and particularly in the extremely high paddling “Bible Belt” region, is an illogical and harmful, yet nonetheless fairly widespread, “Christian” interpretation of a few Old Testament verses.
How can I use the word “illogical” and apply that to biblical interpretation? Isn’t interpreting the Bible impossible to objectively look at? The answer here—in spite of an acknowledged wide variety of interpretations on many biblical subjects—is surprisingly simple. To decide whether the Bible was “inspired” or not is a matter of Faith. Interpreting the Bible after you accept it, however, is often a matter of logic. Those who cite the Bible to back school paddling are, simply put, teaching something that the Bible never actually taught. They are, beyond that, logically inconsistent in their approach. They have no “rule” of interpretation that is consistently applied.
Beyond the illogic of trying to apply a select few Old Testament teachings to Gentiles today they don’t even “literally” follow even those. They do not live out a “literal” interpretation, as they claim, of even those highly selective, out of context, child-beating teachings. The “paddle pushers” ignore completely most of the other “Old Testament” teachings. They selectively try to “force fit” only their child hitting verses to modern Gentile abusive practices that they like to do. For them the Bible provides justification for sadistically and sexually beating adolescent’s buttocks.
They seem oblivious to the biblical fact that the “Old Testament” was never given to “Gentiles,” Christian or otherwise. The Old Testament was never given as a “law” of any kind to Gentile Christians. It was never meant to be followed by them in any way, and for that matter it was not meant to be followed by Jewish Christians either once the Christian era began. Any teachings of Jesus that sometimes get quoted where He says He did not come to “destroy the law”—however you interpret that—was given only to his Jewish followers, upon whom the Old Law was still in effect at the time. The Gentile Christians, after Christ’s crucifixion, were given only the message of the New Testament, with the Old serving as historical and religious background, and with perhaps some prophecies to unfold.
Chapter 10: “Did Jesus Teach "School Paddling?”